Menu
Log in
MENA Survey Report

What MENA Journalists Have Been Facing Since October 7

A survey of nearly 70 journalists reveals the heightened scrutiny, uneven standards of objectivity, and limited support at the moment their voices are most needed.

Introduction

Since October 7, journalists of Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) descent have faced intensified scrutiny in their newsrooms. To better understand these experiences, AMEJA surveyed about 70 journalists working across the United States and beyond.

The findings are clear: reporters of MENA descent are asked to prove their neutrality more than their peers, their identities are treated as implied biases, they are discouraged from covering stories tied to their communities, and they receive little institutional support.

This report captures not just data but the lived experiences of journalists working under suspicion, silencing pressures, and fear at the exact moment their voices are most needed.

Many journalists feel the space for their reporting has narrowed since October 7.
68%

noticed changes in how editors assign, frame, or edit coverage of MENA communities. Only 10% said no.

85%

said their reporting on the MENA region has been held to a higher standard of neutrality.

75%

said newsroom expectations of objectivity are applied unevenly depending on background or identity.

68%

said their impartiality has been questioned explicitly because of their ethnicity or religion.

44%

reported increased online harassment since October 7.

Survey Results

Hover a row to see exact respondent counts. Percentages appear at the end of bars.

Editorial Standards

Do you feel newsroom expectations around objectivity are applied unevenly based on a journalist's background or identity?
Yes
75.36%
Somewhat
11.59%
No
4.35%
Not sure
8.70%
Do you feel your reporting on the MENA region is held to a higher standard of neutrality or “balance” than coverage of other regions?
Always
50.75%
Often
22.39%
Sometimes
11.94%
Rarely
7.46%
Never
7.46%
Have you ever had your objectivity or impartiality questioned based on your ethnic or religious background?
Yes, frequently
15.94%
Yes, occasionally
52.17%
No
31.88%
Have you been discouraged (explicitly or implicitly) from reporting on issues related to Palestine, Islam, or MENA identity?
Yes
44.93%
No
55.07%
Have you faced editorial pushback when trying to pitch or publish stories that center MENA voices?
Yes, frequently
20.90%
Yes, occasionally
35.82%
No
43.28%
Have you been asked to include disclaimers, qualifiers, or opposing viewpoints in your work in ways that feel disproportionate or performative?
Yes, frequently
19.12%
Yes, occasionally
42.65%
No
38.24%
Since October 7, have you noticed any changes in how your editors assign, frame, or edit coverage related to the MENA communities?
Yes
47.83%
Somewhat
20.29%
No
10.14%
Not sure
21.74%
Do you feel your newsroom is committed to cover MENA communities fairly and accurately?
Very well equipped
16.42%
Somewhat equipped
40.30%
Not very equipped
26.87%
Not at all equipped
16.42%

Safety

Do you feel safe expressing your personal views—on social media or internally—without fear of professional repercussions, audience backlash, or editorial pushback?
Yes, frequently
7.35%
Yes, occasionally
27.94%
No
64.71%
Have you had to self-censor your language or reporting because of fear of backlash?
Yes, frequently
32.35%
Yes, occasionally
42.65%
Rarely
14.71%
Never
10.29%
Have you received threats or felt unsafe in public or professional settings due to your reporting on MENA-related issues?
Yes
27.94%
No
39.71%
Not applicable
32.35%
Since October 7, have you experienced an increase in online harassment related to your reporting or identity?
Yes
27.94%
Somewhat
16.18%
No
55.88%

Institutional Support

Has your newsroom manager proactively checked in with you or others from similar backgrounds about your safety, mental health, or professional needs?
Yes
23.53%
No
55.88%
Not sure
20.59%
Has your newsroom manager proactively checked in with you or others from similar backgrounds about your safety, mental health, or professional needs?
Yes
10.29%
No
54.41%
Not sure
35.29%
Do you believe that MENA journalists are underrepresented in leadership roles within your organization?
Yes
60.29%
No
13.24%
Not sure
26.47%
Do you feel safe expressing your personal views—on social media or internally—without fear of professional repercussions, audience backlash, or editorial pushback?
Very confident
8.82%
Somewhat
36.76%
Not very
29.41%
Not at all
25.00%

Conclusion

This survey makes visible what many MENA journalists have long felt in isolation: that their work is often scrutinized more harshly, their identities questioned as biases, and their professional risks compounded by online harassment and limited institutional support. Nearly half have been discouraged from covering issues central to their communities. Three in four report that “objectivity” is enforced unevenly depending on who they are. Most have had their impartiality questioned, and many feel compelled to self-censor. These are not isolated experiences but systemic patterns. Newsroom leadership has largely failed to meet the moment. Few managers proactively check in. Few outlets provide mental health or security resources. Confidence in internal accountability is low.

As an association, AMEJA takes these findings as both validation of what our members have voiced privately and as a call to collective action. Strengthening MENA journalists in U.S. media is our mission, and this moment demands redoubled effort. The data points toward clear priorities:

  • Equity in editorial standards. Newsrooms must apply expectations of balance and neutrality consistently, without treating MENA journalists as suspect or unreliable.
  • Safety and support. Employers should offer concrete resources—mental health care, legal support, access to data privacy tools, and security training for those targeted for their reporting.
  • Invest in leadership pathways. With MENA journalists underrepresented in decision-making roles, representation at the top must be a priority if coverage is to change.
  • Build community solidarity. Where institutions fall short, journalists can and must turn to one another. AMEJA will continue to provide mentorship, connection, and advocacy to make sure no one faces these pressures in isolation.

AMEJA is committed to carrying these findings into conversations with newsroom leaders, allies, and the wider public, to ensure that MENA journalists are empowered, protected, and heard. If you are in a leadership position in your newsroom or media company, please reach out to the AMEJA Board to discuss the findings and pathways to improving the environment for your journalists.

© 2025 AMEJA. Please cite this page when referencing the results.


©2022 AMEJA.org All Rights Reserved

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software